PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-73.67%
Negative EBIT growth while WEED.TO is at 62.76%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-73.67%
Negative operating income growth while WEED.TO is at 62.76%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-89.61%
Negative net income growth while WEED.TO stands at 57.90%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-90.91%
Negative EPS growth while WEED.TO is at 97.93%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-90.91%
Negative diluted EPS growth while WEED.TO is at 97.93%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.68%
Positive OCF growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
98.68%
Positive FCF growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.37%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
97.37%
Positive OCF/share growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
97.37%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
45.31%
Positive 10Y CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
45.31%
Positive 5Y CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
45.31%
Positive short-term CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-18.10%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while WEED.TO stands at 5.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-18.10%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while WEED.TO is at 5.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-18.10%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while WEED.TO is at 10.30%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.46%
AR growth well above WEED.TO's 60.89%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.28%
Negative asset growth while WEED.TO invests at 91.17%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.94%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.67%
We expand SG&A while WEED.TO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.