PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.81%
Positive EBIT growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
41.81%
Positive operating income growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
45.90%
Positive net income growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
47.62%
Positive EPS growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
47.62%
Positive diluted EPS growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4156.92%
Negative OCF growth while WEED.TO is at 33.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-4156.92%
Negative FCF growth while WEED.TO is at 77.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-103.85%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while WEED.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-103.85%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while WEED.TO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-103.85%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
83.46%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 83.46% while WEED.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
83.46%
Net income/share CAGR of 83.46% while WEED.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
83.46%
Positive short-term CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-57.10%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while WEED.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-57.10%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while WEED.TO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-57.10%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while WEED.TO is at 4.51%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.34%
Our AR growth while WEED.TO is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.01%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.09%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.81%
We cut SG&A while WEED.TO invests at 99.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.