PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.05%
EBIT growth below 50% of WEED.TO's 299.01%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
22.05%
Operating income growth under 50% of WEED.TO's 299.01%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
22.04%
Net income growth under 50% of WEED.TO's 288.38%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
21.74%
EPS growth under 50% of WEED.TO's 200.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
21.74%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of WEED.TO's 150.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.50%
Positive OCF growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
93.50%
Positive FCF growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-102.50%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while WEED.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-102.50%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-102.50%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
73.12%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 73.12% while WEED.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
73.12%
Below 50% of WEED.TO's 2222.54%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
73.12%
Below 50% of WEED.TO's 394.57%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-79.29%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while WEED.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-79.29%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while WEED.TO is at 204.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-79.29%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while WEED.TO is at 234.21%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.53%
Firm’s AR is declining while WEED.TO shows 74.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.43%
Negative asset growth while WEED.TO invests at 148.86%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-9.38%
We have a declining book value while WEED.TO shows 108.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
352.04%
SG&A growth well above WEED.TO's 31.82%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.