PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5650.01%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-5650.01%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-40472.45%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-3050.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-3050.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1209.23%
Share count expansion well above WEED.TO's 46.24%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1209.23%
Diluted share count expanding well above WEED.TO's 22.74%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33934.54%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-40083.77%
Negative FCF growth while WEED.TO is at 26.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.16%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while WEED.TO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-51.16%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-51.16%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-117.44%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-117.44%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-117.44%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
74.46%
Equity/share CAGR of 74.46% while WEED.TO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
74.46%
Below 50% of WEED.TO's 150.56%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
74.46%
Below 50% of WEED.TO's 175.04%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
110905.89%
AR growth well above WEED.TO's 8.60%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7369.40%
Asset growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 20.78%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
552.07%
Positive BV/share change while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41942.29%
SG&A growth well above WEED.TO's 22.01%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.