PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.92%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-17.46%
Negative gross profit growth while WEED.TO is at 294.58%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-31.73%
Negative EBIT growth while WEED.TO is at 92.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-31.73%
Negative operating income growth while WEED.TO is at 92.33%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
6.32%
Positive net income growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.67%
Positive EPS growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
9.09%
Positive diluted EPS growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
8.22%
Share reduction more than 1.5x WEED.TO's 30.13%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
6.33%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x WEED.TO's 30.13%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.13%
OCF growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 47.10%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
150.08%
FCF growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 47.16%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
314.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of WEED.TO's 823.51%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-45.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while WEED.TO stands at 155.88%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
8257.32%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
66.67%
Positive OCF/share growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
133.03%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-1627.18%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-333.74%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-256.42%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
7683.64%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x WEED.TO's 2036.07%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
181.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x WEED.TO's 42.14%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
18.65%
Positive short-term equity growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.79%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-1.52%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.11%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-9.22%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-7.43%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-0.60%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
4.40%
We expand SG&A while WEED.TO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.