PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.51%
Positive revenue growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
674.09%
Positive gross profit growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
92.54%
EBIT growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 43.97%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
92.54%
Operating income growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 43.97%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
89.98%
Net income growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 57.41%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
90.72%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x WEED.TO's 60.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
90.72%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x WEED.TO's 60.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
6.68%
Share count expansion well above WEED.TO's 7.94%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
6.68%
Diluted share count expanding well above WEED.TO's 7.94%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
334.00%
OCF growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 32.27%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
260.05%
FCF growth above 1.5x WEED.TO's 33.01%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
480.08%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x WEED.TO's 197.36%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-38.62%
Negative 3Y CAGR while WEED.TO stands at 107.31%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
1711.87%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x WEED.TO's 82.12%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
360.13%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x WEED.TO's 62.43%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
543.04%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x WEED.TO's 4.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-16516.68%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while WEED.TO is at 26.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-737.15%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
38.51%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of WEED.TO's 44.23%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
5797.52%
Positive growth while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
5.79%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-7.21%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.06%
Our AR growth while WEED.TO is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-1.11%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.57%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-8.38%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-2.25%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
5.26%
We increase R&D while WEED.TO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
22.38%
We expand SG&A while WEED.TO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.