PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.39%
Revenue growth 50-75% of CRON.TO's 28.47%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
81.54%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRON.TO's 6.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
6.16%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of CRON.TO's 11.04%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-8.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-65.35%
R&D reduction while CRON.TO shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
23.71%
G&A growth less than half of CRON.TO's 56.42%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
28.38%
Marketing expense change of 28.38% while CRON.TO maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
21.06%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x CRON.TO's 16.69%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
18.27%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRON.TO's 51.92%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
28.73%
Total costs growth less than half of CRON.TO's 76.14%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
91.22%
Interest expense growth while CRON.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.01%
D&A growth less than half of CRON.TO's 16.69%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
4.99%
EBITDA growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-24.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-39.85%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
428.71%
Other expenses growth less than half of CRON.TO's 2520.06%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
2.92%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of CRON.TO's 118.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.57%
Pre-tax margin decline while CRON.TO shows 114.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
91.22%
Tax expense growth while CRON.TO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.92%
Net income growth below 50% of CRON.TO's 121.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.57%
Net margin decline while CRON.TO shows 116.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.20%
EPS decline while CRON.TO shows 119.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.20%
Diluted EPS decline while CRON.TO shows 115.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
29.60%
Share count reduction below 50% of CRON.TO's 5.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
23.80%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CRON.TO's 33.96%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.