1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.86%
Revenue growth below 50% of CRON.TO's 81.89%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1550.93%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRON.TO's 168.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-21.47%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
25.04%
Margin expansion while CRON.TO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
96.49%
R&D change of 96.49% while CRON.TO maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
145.83%
G&A growth above 1.5x CRON.TO's 6.13%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
38.40%
Marketing expense change of 38.40% while CRON.TO maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
7.42%
Other expenses growth less than half of CRON.TO's 282.15%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
92.30%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CRON.TO's 42.00%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
46.90%
Total costs growth less than half of CRON.TO's 261.45%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
146.44%
Interest expense change of 146.44% while CRON.TO maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
40.15%
D&A growth 50-75% of CRON.TO's 73.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-12.72%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-262.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.53%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
529.48%
Other expenses growth while CRON.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
871.04%
Pre-tax income growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
737.95%
Pre-tax margin growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
415.60%
Tax expense growth while CRON.TO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
686.38%
Net income growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
585.17%
Net margin growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
671.43%
EPS growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
669.28%
Diluted EPS growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.