1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.79%
Revenue growth 50-75% of CRON.TO's 27.57%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
365.67%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRON.TO's 168.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-55.89%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
82.86%
Margin expansion while CRON.TO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
86.76%
R&D change of 86.76% while CRON.TO maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
63.48%
G&A growth above 1.5x CRON.TO's 0.92%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
33.89%
Marketing expense growth less than half of CRON.TO's 293.25%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
761.64%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x CRON.TO's 652.31%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
68.11%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x CRON.TO's 56.83%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
5.19%
Total costs growth less than half of CRON.TO's 78.40%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-7.90%
Interest expense reduction while CRON.TO shows 177.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
153.97%
D&A growth while CRON.TO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-115.86%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1033.24%
EBITDA margin growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-110.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-85.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-114.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-141.47%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-136.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-143.97%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-140.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-135.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-129.18%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-128.65%
Diluted EPS decline while CRON.TO shows 4.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
40.06%
Share count reduction below 50% of CRON.TO's 23.36%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
37.54%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CRON.TO's 52.74%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.