PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.18%
Revenue growth below 50% of CRON.TO's 50.08%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
19.31%
Cost growth less than half of CRON.TO's 147.72%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-22.45%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.64%
R&D reduction while CRON.TO shows 56.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-4.92%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
26.68%
Marketing expense growth less than half of CRON.TO's 87.08%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-196.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.34%
Operating expenses growth less than half of CRON.TO's 9.79%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
12.78%
Total costs growth less than half of CRON.TO's 43.65%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.55%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-59.60%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-345.70%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
23.03%
EBITDA margin growth while CRON.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-866.94%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-850.60%
Operating margin decline while CRON.TO shows 5.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-248.96%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-969.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-951.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-137.19%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1775.75%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1740.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1785.39%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1785.39%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.26%
Share count reduction below 50% of CRON.TO's 2.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
11.07%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CRON.TO's 3.63%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.