PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.96%
Revenue growth below 50% of CRON.TO's 9.39%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
42.86%
Cost growth above 1.5x CRON.TO's 16.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-116.90%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-116.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.07%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-4.47%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
25.86%
Marketing expense growth while CRON.TO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
25.44%
Other expenses growth while CRON.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.97%
Operating expenses growth while CRON.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
28.73%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRON.TO's 1.46%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
646.45%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x CRON.TO's 31.88%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-16.68%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-242.73%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
492.57%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x CRON.TO's 97.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1962.12%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x CRON.TO's 2.50%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1942.56%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x CRON.TO's 10.86%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-89.29%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1011.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1002.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-107.81%
Tax expense reduction while CRON.TO shows 1411.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1159.97%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1149.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1118.10%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1118.10%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.74%
Share count reduction below 50% of CRON.TO's 2.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
4.12%
Diluted share change of 4.12% while CRON.TO is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.