1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.93%
Revenue decline while CRON.TO shows 3.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.66%
Cost reduction while CRON.TO shows 2.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-15.04%
Gross profit decline while CRON.TO shows 5.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.53%
Margin decline while CRON.TO shows 1.84% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
41.67%
R&D growth above 1.5x CRON.TO's 17.15%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-14.24%
G&A reduction while CRON.TO shows 4.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-13.96%
Marketing expense reduction while CRON.TO shows 17.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
1416.14%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x CRON.TO's 55.57%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
555.63%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x CRON.TO's 11.36%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
220.71%
Total costs growth above 1.5x CRON.TO's 6.73%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.88%
Interest expense change of 7.88% while CRON.TO maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
412.62%
D&A growth above 1.5x CRON.TO's 47.96%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-1411.63%
EBITDA decline while CRON.TO shows 47.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1616.43%
EBITDA margin decline while CRON.TO shows 49.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1383.16%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1584.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-305.08%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-851.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-980.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.91%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-825.75%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-951.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-782.35%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-500.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.01%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x CRON.TO's 25.88%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
5.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x CRON.TO's 25.88%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.