1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.79%
Positive growth while OGI.TO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
365.67%
Cost increase while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-55.89%
Gross profit decline while OGI.TO shows 165.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
82.86%
Margin expansion below 50% of OGI.TO's 325.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
86.76%
R&D change of 86.76% while OGI.TO maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
63.48%
G&A growth while OGI.TO reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
33.89%
Marketing expense growth 1.1-1.25x OGI.TO's 29.42%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
761.64%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 6.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
68.11%
Operating expenses growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.19%
Total costs growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.90%
Interest expense reduction while OGI.TO shows 2.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
153.97%
D&A growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 65.99%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-115.86%
EBITDA decline while OGI.TO shows 270.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1033.24%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 451.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-110.68%
Operating income decline while OGI.TO shows 348.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-85.15%
Operating margin decline while OGI.TO shows 617.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.26%
Other expenses reduction while OGI.TO shows 37.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-141.47%
Pre-tax income decline while OGI.TO shows 796.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-136.45%
Pre-tax margin decline while OGI.TO shows 1334.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-143.97%
Tax expense reduction while OGI.TO shows 869.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-140.68%
Net income decline while OGI.TO shows 538.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-135.75%
Net margin decline while OGI.TO shows 923.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-129.18%
EPS decline while OGI.TO shows 52.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-128.65%
Diluted EPS decline while OGI.TO shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
40.06%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 310.35%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
37.54%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 340.82%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.