PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
59.45%
Revenue growth 50-75% of OGI.TO's 116.53%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
2402.78%
Cost growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 148.28%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-53.84%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-73.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
128.48%
R&D change of 128.48% while OGI.TO maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-2.99%
G&A reduction while OGI.TO shows 110.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
71.99%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 33.14%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
770.17%
Other expenses growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.13%
Operating expenses growth less than half of OGI.TO's 76.84%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
80.79%
Total costs growth less than half of OGI.TO's 184.90%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
68.97%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 2.96%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-15.84%
D&A reduction while OGI.TO shows 6.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
117.98%
EBITDA growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
726.73%
EBITDA margin growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-103.69%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
91.61%
Other expenses growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
143.88%
Pre-tax income growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.95%
Pre-tax margin growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
95.09%
Tax expense growth while OGI.TO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
153.01%
Net income growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.67%
Net margin growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
141.84%
EPS growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
141.84%
Diluted EPS growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.51%
Share count reduction below 50% of OGI.TO's 1.69%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
8.22%
Diluted share increase while OGI.TO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.