1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
242.97%
Positive growth while OGI.TO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
262.43%
Cost growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 31.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
191.95%
Positive growth while OGI.TO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-14.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-63.20%
R&D reduction while OGI.TO shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
149.83%
G&A growth while OGI.TO reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-15.82%
Marketing expense reduction while OGI.TO shows 41.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-103.97%
Other expenses reduction while OGI.TO shows 43.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
81.88%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 14.22%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
149.15%
Total costs growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 25.56%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
15.31%
Interest expense growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
38.60%
D&A growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 21.98%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-269.53%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-116.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-318.21%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-102.79%
Other expenses reduction while OGI.TO shows 78.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-292.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-156.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-246.51%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-299.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-158.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-295.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-295.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.15%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 15.25%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.34%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 14.36%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.