1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.48%
Revenue decline while OGI.TO shows 38.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2.66%
Cost increase while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-18.23%
Gross profit decline while OGI.TO shows 112.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-16.16%
Margin decline while OGI.TO shows 108.88% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-42.29%
R&D reduction while OGI.TO shows 13.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
53.56%
G&A growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 14.49%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-7.15%
Marketing expense reduction while OGI.TO shows 30.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-231.01%
Other expenses reduction while OGI.TO shows 5429.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
49.13%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 24.04%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
18.08%
Total costs growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
64.38%
Interest expense growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.04%
D&A reduction while OGI.TO shows 6.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-6043.79%
EBITDA decline while OGI.TO shows 103.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
64.56%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to OGI.TO's 85.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-61.11%
Operating income decline while OGI.TO shows 58.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-65.20%
Operating margin decline while OGI.TO shows 69.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-194.63%
Other expenses reduction while OGI.TO shows 122.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-159.99%
Pre-tax income decline while OGI.TO shows 93.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-166.59%
Pre-tax margin decline while OGI.TO shows 95.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
133.92%
Tax expense growth while OGI.TO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-205.02%
Net income decline while OGI.TO shows 93.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-212.77%
Net margin decline while OGI.TO shows 95.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-181.58%
EPS decline while OGI.TO shows 95.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-181.58%
Diluted EPS decline while OGI.TO shows 95.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.00%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 23.05%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
9.00%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 23.70%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.