PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.92%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-0.56%
Cost reduction while OGI.TO shows 52.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-17.46%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.60%
R&D reduction while OGI.TO shows 40.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
3.07%
G&A growth while OGI.TO reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
7.60%
Marketing expense growth while OGI.TO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-1.49%
Other expenses reduction while OGI.TO shows 3.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.64%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of OGI.TO's 4.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
0.85%
Total costs growth less than half of OGI.TO's 28.20%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-29.59%
Interest expense reduction while OGI.TO shows 53.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.20%
D&A reduction while OGI.TO shows 1.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-144.55%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5663.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.73%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
42.37%
Other expenses growth less than half of OGI.TO's 223.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-25.20%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-262.43%
Tax expense reduction while OGI.TO shows 100.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.32%
Net income growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.42%
Net margin growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.67%
EPS growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.09%
Diluted EPS growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.22%
Share count reduction below 50% of OGI.TO's 0.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
6.33%
Diluted share increase while OGI.TO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.