PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.51%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 3.22%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
10.25%
Cost growth less than half of OGI.TO's 29.51%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
7.27%
Positive growth while OGI.TO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.11%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
6.96%
G&A growth less than half of OGI.TO's 21.25%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
9.07%
Marketing expense growth 50-75% of OGI.TO's 17.58%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
78.03%
Other expenses growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.97%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x OGI.TO's 3.71%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
8.29%
Total costs growth less than half of OGI.TO's 18.37%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-12.30%
Interest expense reduction while OGI.TO shows 35.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.48%
D&A growth less than half of OGI.TO's 10.33%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-17.69%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
50.86%
EBITDA margin growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-21.53%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
45.19%
Other expenses growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.87%
Pre-tax margin growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-146.53%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
12.27%
Net income growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.89%
Net margin growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.96%
EPS growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.96%
Diluted EPS growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.73%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 12.32%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
5.73%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 12.32%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.