PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY.TO)
2.000.05 (2.56%)
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.98%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-15.76%
Cost reduction while OGI.TO shows 5.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.67%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.39%
Margin expansion while OGI.TO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-73.35%
R&D reduction while OGI.TO shows 42.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-7.64%
G&A reduction while OGI.TO shows 19.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-9.84%
Marketing expense reduction while OGI.TO shows 22.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
154.29%
Other expenses growth less than half of OGI.TO's 478.07%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
14.76%
Operating expenses growth less than half of OGI.TO's 48.34%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-5.54%
Total costs reduction while OGI.TO shows 21.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-55.84%
Interest expense reduction while OGI.TO shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.26%
D&A growth less than half of OGI.TO's 10.22%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-28.36%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-77.54%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-104.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
113.69%
Other expenses growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.48%
Pre-tax income growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.77%
Pre-tax margin growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
103.21%
Tax expense growth while OGI.TO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-23.37%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.75%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.75%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.30%
Share count reduction below 50% of OGI.TO's 8.89%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
10.30%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of OGI.TO's 4.86%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.