PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.86%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x OGI.TO's 7.91%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
17.29%
Cost increase while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
30.04%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of OGI.TO's 41.96%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
7.59%
Margin expansion below 50% of OGI.TO's 31.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-60.00%
R&D reduction while OGI.TO shows 3.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-7.96%
G&A reduction while OGI.TO shows 5.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
67.21%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 17.29%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
132.35%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 2.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
122.90%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x OGI.TO's 8.65%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
105.50%
Total costs growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
83.16%
Interest expense change of 83.16% while OGI.TO maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-80.48%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-114.58%
EBITDA decline while OGI.TO shows 197.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-77.54%
EBITDA margin decline while OGI.TO shows 190.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-130.61%
Operating income decline while OGI.TO shows 72.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.81%
Operating margin decline while OGI.TO shows 74.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
130.66%
Other expenses growth while OGI.TO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-75.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10502.49%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-61.23%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.00%
EPS growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth while OGI.TO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Share count reduction while OGI.TO shows 3.77% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-100.00%
Diluted share reduction while OGI.TO shows 0.30% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.