PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
6.26
Current Ratio > 1.5x ACB.TO's 2.91. David Dodd would confirm if this surplus liquidity is put to good use.
5.99
Quick Ratio > 1.5x ACB.TO's 2.77. David Dodd would verify if the company can handle unexpected shortfalls much better.
2.68
Cash Ratio 1.25–1.5x ACB.TO's 2.21. Bruce Berkowitz might see a strong liquidity buffer compared to the competitor.
-11.57
Both companies show negative interest coverage. Martin Whitman would investigate if industry distress creates special situation opportunities.
0.02
Positive short-term coverage while ACB.TO shows negative coverage. John Neff would examine our cash flow advantages in a challenging market.