1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
5.64
Similar to WEED.TO's ratio of 6.10. Walter Schloss would see both operating with a similar safety margin.
4.98
Similar ratio to WEED.TO's 5.17. Walter Schloss might see both running close to industry norms.
3.98
Cash Ratio 1.25–1.5x WEED.TO's 3.10. Bruce Berkowitz might see a strong liquidity buffer compared to the competitor.
-3.60
Negative interest coverage while WEED.TO shows 0.00. Joel Greenblatt would look for earnings improvements and debt restructuring catalysts.
-2.84
Both companies show negative short-term coverage. Martin Whitman would investigate if industry distress creates special situation opportunities.