PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
1.91
0.75–0.9x WEED.TO's 2.52. Bill Ackman might push for more working capital or better cash management.
1.35
0.5–0.75x WEED.TO's 2.07. Martin Whitman might be concerned about coverage if a crisis hits.
0.45
Below 0.5x WEED.TO's 1.22. Michael Burry could foresee potential liquidity shocks if times get tough.
-16.67
Both companies show negative interest coverage. Martin Whitman would investigate if industry distress creates special situation opportunities.
0.13
Positive short-term coverage while WEED.TO shows negative coverage. John Neff would examine our cash flow advantages in a challenging market.