PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 3.06M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -3.40
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
1.79
Current Ratio 1.25–1.5x WEED.TO's 1.58. Bruce Berkowitz might see stronger short-term risk mitigation vs. competitor.
1.32
Similar ratio to WEED.TO's 1.25. Walter Schloss might see both running close to industry norms.
0.48
0.5–0.75x WEED.TO's 0.73. Martin Whitman would question if short-term obligations are too high relative to cash.
-17.90
Both companies show negative interest coverage. Martin Whitman would investigate if industry distress creates special situation opportunities.
0.20
Positive short-term coverage while WEED.TO shows negative coverage. John Neff would examine our cash flow advantages in a challenging market.