PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.90 - 2.15
0.48 - 2.54
9.88M / 2.92M (Avg.)
-0.48 | -4.19
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-0.28%
Negative ROE while WEED.TO stands at 9.48%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.20%
Negative ROA while WEED.TO stands at 5.63%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
0.89%
Positive ROCE while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff would see if competitive strategy explains the difference.
51.34%
Gross margin above 1.5x WEED.TO's 20.00%. David Dodd would assess whether superior technology or brand is driving this.
14.33%
Positive operating margin while WEED.TO is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
-3.52%
Negative net margin while WEED.TO has 288.10%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.