PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-5.39%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-5.39% vs LSCC's -5.14%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.39%
Similar yoy growth to LSCC's -5.14%. Walter Schloss would note comparable liquidity expansions. Examine capital usage strategies.
-2.63%
Receivables growth less than half of LSCC's 12.36%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-1.72%
Inventory growth below half of LSCC's 2.17%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
53.15%
Above 1.5x LSCC's 12.57%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
4.75%
0.5-0.75x LSCC's 8.22%. Martin Whitman might see risk if this hampers near-term financial flexibility.
-2.09%
Below half LSCC's 13.68%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.40%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.15%
Below half of LSCC's 14.53%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.81%
Below half of LSCC's 9.00%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-1.61%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-26.83%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.70%
Less than half of LSCC's 21.09%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
2.11%
Less than half of LSCC's 20.67%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-0.97%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.74%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.25%
Higher Total Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.69%
Less than half of LSCC's 19.87%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.11%
Below half LSCC's 35.09%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.60%
Less than half of LSCC's 1.93%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
1.99%
Below half LSCC's 6.94%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.81%
Below half LSCC's 9.00%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.06%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.96%
Less than half of LSCC's 5.26%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.