205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-5.82%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-5.82% vs LSCC's -26.83%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.82%
Below half of LSCC's -26.83%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
13.12%
Receivables growth above 1.5x LSCC's 5.88%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
13.04%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
20.73%
Above 1.5x LSCC's 5.96%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
11.97%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's 2.80%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
0.56%
Below half LSCC's 6.77%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.01%
Less than half of LSCC's 100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.81%
Below half of LSCC's 7.73%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.91%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's 3.50%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-2.47%
Less than half of LSCC's -7.10%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
717.24%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.45%
Less than half of LSCC's -9.63%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
23.36%
Less than half of LSCC's -8.15%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-22.92%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.29%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-10.78%
Above 1.5x LSCC's -7.07%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.05%
Less than half of LSCC's -8.15%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.84%
0.5-0.75x LSCC's 19.68%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.78%
Above 1.5x LSCC's 1.47%. Michael Burry suspects a significant bump in 'other' equity items vs. competitor.
7.35%
Similar yoy to LSCC's 7.02%. Walter Schloss sees parallel net worth trends.
5.91%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's 3.50%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.44%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
6.81%
Less than half of LSCC's 27.16%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.