PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
33.17%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of LSCC's 275.51%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
27.27%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating better performance.
29.95%
Below half of LSCC's 275.51%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
10.84%
Receivables growth 1.1-1.25x LSCC's 9.35%. Bill Ackman would demand reasons for extending more credit than the competitor.
2.55%
Inventory growth below half of LSCC's -16.36%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
0.60%
Other current assets growth < half of LSCC's -6.81%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
12.91%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's 4.83%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
1.59%
Below half LSCC's -2.94%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.21%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.49%
Below half of LSCC's -2.90%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.36%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's 3.69%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-58.27%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's -45.69%. Martin Whitman sees potential reliance on supplier financing. Verify liquidity.
13.74%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both LSCC and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Less than half of LSCC's 32.43%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
13.49%
Less than half of LSCC's -7.49%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-1.59%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.42%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.18%
Less than half of LSCC's -45.69%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.42%
Less than half of LSCC's -7.49%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
1.10%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8.95%
0.5-0.75x LSCC's 13.27%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
-10.00%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.26%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's 5.84%. Bruce Berkowitz notes an above-average equity expansion.
7.36%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's 3.69%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
27.27%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating better performance.
1.99%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-23.15%
Less than half of LSCC's -275.51%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.