PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-3.16%
Cash & equivalents declining -3.16% while LSCC's grows 7.07%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
9.58%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating better performance.
3.64%
Cash + STI yoy 0.5-0.75x LSCC's 7.07%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging short-term reserves. Confirm debt coverage.
7.11%
Receivables growth 50-75% of LSCC's 13.68%. Bruce Berkowitz would note relatively tighter receivables. Check if sales remain robust.
4.86%
Inventory growth below half of LSCC's -16.67%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
2.70%
Other current assets growth < half of LSCC's 12.42%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
5.10%
0.5-0.75x LSCC's 8.57%. Martin Whitman might see risk if this hampers near-term financial flexibility.
4.02%
Below half LSCC's -4.55%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.42%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-17.05%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.93%
Below half of LSCC's -4.48%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.78%
0.5-0.75x LSCC's 6.78%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
5.07%
Less than half of LSCC's 101.59%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-7.50%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.63%
Less than half of LSCC's 13.81%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.73%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.80%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.77%
Less than half of LSCC's -98.41%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.27%
Less than half of LSCC's 14.29%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.31%
Similar yoy to LSCC's 12.55%. Walter Schloss sees parallel earnings retention vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.77%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's 5.52%. Bruce Berkowitz notes an above-average equity expansion.
3.78%
0.5-0.75x LSCC's 6.78%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
9.58%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.41%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.04%
Less than half of LSCC's -7.07%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.