PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
20.66%
Cash & equivalents changing 20.66% while LSCC's remains stable. Warren Buffett would analyze the strategic implications of this divergence.
-19.43%
Both LSCC and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
4.19%
Higher Cash + Short-Term Investments Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating better performance.
15.40%
Receivables growth less than half of LSCC's -81.11%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
7.03%
Inventory growth below half of LSCC's -2.76%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
5.34%
Other current assets growth < half of LSCC's 709.60%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
8.61%
Similar yoy growth to LSCC's 8.12%. Walter Schloss notes comparable short-term expansions. Investigate quality of these assets.
0.78%
Below half LSCC's 3.61%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.23%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
39.13%
Above 1.5x LSCC's 12.81%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
2.89%
Below half of LSCC's 9.05%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.18%
0.5-0.75x LSCC's 8.37%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
-64.30%
Above 1.5x LSCC's -30.05%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
341.67%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both LSCC and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Less than half of LSCC's 78.40%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
6.64%
Less than half of LSCC's 13.96%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-1.98%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.21%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.97%
Less than half of LSCC's -30.05%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.01%
Less than half of LSCC's 13.96%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.83%
Similar yoy to LSCC's 11.48%. Walter Schloss sees parallel earnings retention vs. competitor.
-232600.00%
Less than half of LSCC's 100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.70%
Similar yoy to LSCC's 7.20%. Walter Schloss sees parallel net worth trends.
6.18%
0.5-0.75x LSCC's 8.37%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
-19.43%
Both LSCC and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
3.05%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-220.00%
Higher Net Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.