205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
31.13%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of LSCC's 69.87%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
-30.93%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of LSCC's -100.00%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
10.40%
Below half of LSCC's 69.87%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
13.60%
Receivables growth less than half of LSCC's 49.28%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
5.04%
Inventory growth below half of LSCC's 27.11%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
3.15%
Other current assets growth 50-75% of LSCC's 5.89%. Bruce Berkowitz notes fewer expansions. Possibly simpler working capital.
9.74%
0.5-0.75x LSCC's 18.93%. Martin Whitman might see risk if this hampers near-term financial flexibility.
6.77%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's 4.57%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a significant push to expand capacity faster than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.71%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
9.63%
Less than half of LSCC's -14.92%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
6.80%
Below half of LSCC's -6.61%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.58%
0.5-0.75x LSCC's 12.39%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
12.05%
Less than half of LSCC's 45.51%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
137.04%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.43%
Less than half of LSCC's 37.24%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.24%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.37%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.44%
Less than half of LSCC's 45.51%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.90%
Less than half of LSCC's 37.24%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
101.06%
Less than half of LSCC's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
10.87%
Similar yoy to LSCC's 11.59%. Walter Schloss sees parallel earnings retention vs. competitor.
-1.36%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.18%
Similar yoy to LSCC's 8.20%. Walter Schloss sees parallel net worth trends.
8.58%
0.5-0.75x LSCC's 12.39%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
-30.93%
Below half LSCC's -100.00%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
4.60%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-218.33%
Above 1.5x LSCC's -69.87%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.