PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
7.57%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of LSCC's 226.04%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
-43.58%
Both LSCC and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-3.12%
Below half of LSCC's 226.04%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-5.71%
Receivables growth less than half of LSCC's 14.56%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
6.77%
Similar inventory growth to LSCC's 9.00%. Walter Schloss notes comparable inventory strategies or sector norms.
116.11%
Above 1.5x LSCC's 39.05%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
4.45%
Below half of LSCC's 60.52%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
11.63%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's 7.86%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a significant push to expand capacity faster than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.23%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
17.57%
Less than half of LSCC's -23.51%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
10.00%
Below half of LSCC's -8.54%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.61%
Below half of LSCC's 45.84%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
159.01%
Less than half of LSCC's -5.29%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-57.81%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.16%
Similar yoy to LSCC's 12.06%. Walter Schloss sees parallel short-term liability strategies.
-2.19%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.54%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.63%
Less than half of LSCC's -100.44%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.78%
50-75% of LSCC's 11.81%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a lower yoy liability increase.
0.53%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
9.88%
0.75-0.9x LSCC's 11.88%. Bill Ackman questions if competitor reinvests profits more robustly.
98.11%
Similar yoy to LSCC's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel comprehensive income changes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.39%
Below half LSCC's 53.12%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
6.61%
Below half LSCC's 45.84%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-43.58%
Both LSCC and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-6.21%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-39.53%
Less than half of LSCC's -226.04%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.