205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-18.23%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-18.23% vs LSCC's -7.80%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-23.39%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of LSCC's 3.82%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-21.66%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x LSCC's -7.80%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-2.29%
Receivables growth less than half of LSCC's 2.55%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
4.58%
Inventory growth below half of LSCC's -1.74%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-0.17%
Other current assets growth < half of LSCC's 4.03%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-10.70%
Below half of LSCC's 1.20%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.46%
Below half LSCC's 9.23%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.44%
Similar yoy growth to LSCC's 17.47%. Walter Schloss sees parallel approach in non-core expansions.
3.67%
Below half of LSCC's 15.36%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.42%
Below half of LSCC's 5.18%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-67.82%
Above 1.5x LSCC's -27.78%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
-5.63%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both LSCC and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Less than half of LSCC's 73.21%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-20.47%
Less than half of LSCC's 18.00%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-3.11%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.78%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.27%
Less than half of LSCC's -27.78%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.98%
Less than half of LSCC's 18.00%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.26%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.25%
Below half LSCC's 6.80%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-13.21%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.07%
Below half LSCC's 3.77%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-4.42%
Below half LSCC's 5.18%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-23.39%
Below half LSCC's 3.82%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-3.24%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
41.23%
Above 1.5x LSCC's 7.80%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.