PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-15.16%
Cash & equivalents declining -15.16% while LSCC's grows 16.39%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
-6.10%
Both LSCC and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-10.90%
Below half of LSCC's 16.39%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-11.07%
Receivables growth above 1.5x LSCC's -5.03%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-19.26%
Inventory growth 1.1-1.25x LSCC's -17.39%. Bill Ackman would question if the firm overestimates demand vs. competitor.
1.32%
Other current assets growth < half of LSCC's -0.41%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-10.87%
Below half of LSCC's 2.01%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-17.83%
Below half LSCC's 5.71%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.56%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
286.17%
Above 1.5x LSCC's 0.09%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
17.05%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's 1.55%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.61%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's 1.86%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a stronger asset build. Check if it's producing returns.
-19.72%
Less than half of LSCC's 17.60%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
235.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.03%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's 9.83%. Martin Whitman is wary of bigger short-term burdens.
-15.45%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.15%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.35%
Less than half of LSCC's 17.60%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.64%
Less than half of LSCC's 9.83%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.93%
0.5-0.75x LSCC's 4.30%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
-73.33%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.16%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's 1.05%. Bruce Berkowitz notes an above-average equity expansion.
2.61%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's 1.86%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions are well-justified by ROI.
-6.10%
Both LSCC and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-0.15%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
516.22%
Less than half of LSCC's -16.39%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.