PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-50.00%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-50.00% vs LSCC's -39.36%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
60.92%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating better performance.
5.00%
Below half of LSCC's -39.36%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-2.35%
Receivables growth 1.1-1.25x LSCC's -2.12%. Bill Ackman would demand reasons for extending more credit than the competitor.
4.56%
Inventory growth above 1.5x LSCC's 0.53%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
9.29%
Other current assets growth < half of LSCC's 21.02%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
2.58%
Similar yoy growth to LSCC's 2.87%. Walter Schloss notes comparable short-term expansions. Investigate quality of these assets.
-3.79%
Below half LSCC's 2.11%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.09%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
38.11%
Above 1.5x LSCC's 0.17%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
10.53%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's 0.70%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.96%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's 2.19%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
252.19%
Less than half of LSCC's -2.38%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-0.37%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.36%
Less than half of LSCC's -42.94%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-1.25%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.19%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
10.54%
Less than half of LSCC's -27.21%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.19%
Less than half of LSCC's -0.40%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.34%
0.5-0.75x LSCC's 4.46%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
479.49%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.28%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's 2.48%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
6.96%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's 2.19%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
60.92%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.07%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
230.70%
Above 1.5x LSCC's 39.36%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.