205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-62.60%
Cash & equivalents declining -62.60% while LSCC's grows 8.20%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
7.07%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating better performance.
-21.10%
Below half of LSCC's 8.20%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
18.90%
Receivables growth 50-75% of LSCC's 35.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would note relatively tighter receivables. Check if sales remain robust.
7.49%
Inventory growth below half of LSCC's 37.85%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-3.66%
Other current assets growth < half of LSCC's -64.77%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-2.96%
Below half of LSCC's -38.57%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.44%
Below half LSCC's 24.00%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.95%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.68%
Less than half of LSCC's 36.51%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.29%
Below half of LSCC's 295.30%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.61%
Below half of LSCC's 59.88%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
3.55%
Less than half of LSCC's 543.55%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
1.15%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.71%
Less than half of LSCC's 207.17%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-2.93%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.42%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.48%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.06%
Less than half of LSCC's 1132.80%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.48%
Less than half of LSCC's 608.04%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.25%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
6.01%
Below half LSCC's -19.68%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-57.52%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.63%
Below half LSCC's -4.94%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-0.61%
Below half LSCC's 59.88%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
7.07%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating better performance.
-2.08%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
149.72%
Less than half of LSCC's 310.84%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.