205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-28.60%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-28.60% vs LSCC's -8.85%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
5.38%
Short-term investments yoy growth 0.5-0.75x LSCC's 8.80%. Martin Whitman would be cautious about lagging liquidity buildup.
-0.73%
Below half of LSCC's 0.16%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-13.03%
Receivables growth above 1.5x LSCC's -1.39%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-16.82%
Inventory growth above 1.5x LSCC's -4.14%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
-2.79%
Other current assets growth < half of LSCC's -14.29%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-2.77%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's -0.60%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-1.90%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's -1.03%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.46%
50-75% of LSCC's -8.77%. Bruce Berkowitz notes moderate intangible additions. Check if growth is organically driven.
-4.46%
50-75% of LSCC's -8.77%. Bruce Berkowitz notes lower intangible reliance than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
84.06%
1.1-1.25x LSCC's 71.35%. Bill Ackman wonders if the company booked more losses or deferrals than competitor.
-39.55%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-12.32%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's -10.84%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions surpass competitor's pace but remain justified.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.73%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's -5.10%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-1.30%
Less than half of LSCC's -7.06%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-2.33%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-78.57%
Below half of LSCC's 5.11%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
14.94%
Less than half of LSCC's -37.88%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-2.23%
Less than half of LSCC's -19.85%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
1.66%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.01%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.95%
Less than half of LSCC's 21.11%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-12.71%
Less than half of LSCC's 1.13%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.40%
Above 1.5x LSCC's -4.29%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.66%
Below half LSCC's -26.99%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-149.91%
Less than half of LSCC's 96.75%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.83%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's -5.44%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-8.73%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's -5.10%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
5.38%
0.5-0.75x LSCC's 8.80%. Martin Whitman sees possible missed opportunities vs. competitor.
1.53%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
24.75%
Less than half of LSCC's 575.46%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.