205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
92.79%
Cash & equivalents growing 92.79% while LSCC's declined -76.99%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
6.40%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of LSCC's 93.33%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
31.06%
Below half of LSCC's -0.36%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-4.66%
Receivables growth above 1.5x LSCC's -0.54%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-1.11%
Inventory growth below half of LSCC's -2.74%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-22.05%
Other current assets growth < half of LSCC's 180.29%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
13.47%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's 9.95%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if strong current asset growth is used effectively.
-2.57%
0.5-0.75x LSCC's -4.81%. Martin Whitman might see a risk of falling behind in asset investment or shifting strategy.
-100.00%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.82%
50-75% of LSCC's -5.47%. Bruce Berkowitz notes moderate intangible additions. Check if growth is organically driven.
-2.82%
50-75% of LSCC's -5.47%. Bruce Berkowitz notes lower intangible reliance than competitor.
-100.00%
Both LSCC and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
2.29%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
16.76%
Less than half of LSCC's -30.31%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-5.92%
0.5-0.75x LSCC's -11.50%. Martin Whitman wonders if there's insufficient reinvestment vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.81%
Below half of LSCC's -2.51%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
4.18%
Less than half of LSCC's -46.70%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
0.69%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
13.33%
Below half of LSCC's 66.07%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
-11.97%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.43%
Less than half of LSCC's 11.06%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-1.74%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.18%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.80%
Less than half of LSCC's 1.64%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-2.89%
Less than half of LSCC's 0.18%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.33%
Less than half of LSCC's 1.76%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-0.11%
Less than half of LSCC's 0.18%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
5.25%
Below half LSCC's -90.97%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-38.89%
Less than half of LSCC's 65.02%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.82%
Below half LSCC's -4.13%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
2.81%
Below half LSCC's -2.51%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-17.51%
Below half LSCC's 93.33%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-0.48%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-821.50%
Less than half of LSCC's 384.98%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.