205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-37.25%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-37.25% vs LSCC's -30.99%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
87.37%
Short-term investments yoy growth ≥ 1.5x LSCC's 10.26%. David Dodd would see a more robust near-cash position, but confirm efficient allocation.
12.11%
Below half of LSCC's -21.37%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-13.40%
Receivables growth less than half of LSCC's -30.83%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-9.01%
Inventory growth below half of LSCC's 6.14%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
12.24%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.45%
Below half of LSCC's -18.17%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-3.15%
Below half LSCC's 6.14%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
0.02%
Less than half of LSCC's 4895.32%. David Dodd might see less intangible risk, assuming stable revenue growth.
-3.63%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.51%
Less than half of LSCC's 6949.50%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-24.29%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's -6.00%. David Dodd sees an aggressive push into LT investments. Confirm risk management.
-35.41%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.02%
50-75% of LSCC's -1.79%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower 'other assets' expansions.
-3.96%
Below half of LSCC's 185.66%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.96%
Below half of LSCC's 10.02%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-0.32%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-12.93%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
68.33%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
68.33%
Below half of LSCC's -43.60%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
107.52%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-4.61%
Less than half of LSCC's -19.84%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-0.09%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.16%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.42%
Less than half of LSCC's 163.62%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-2.69%
Less than half of LSCC's 163.62%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.40%
Less than half of LSCC's 1.40%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.39%
Below half LSCC's 14.84%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-12.46%
Less than half of LSCC's -216.16%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.67%
Below half LSCC's 11.82%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.96%
Below half LSCC's 10.02%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
59.19%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's 8.54%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
-3.60%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
9.00%
Less than half of LSCC's 30.99%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.