205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-15.29%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-15.29% vs LSCC's -2.69%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-16.40%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of LSCC's 1.90%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-16.00%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x LSCC's -2.69%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
11.85%
Similar receivables growth to LSCC's 13.61%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
1.18%
Inventory growth below half of LSCC's 13.48%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
1.81%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.04%
Below half of LSCC's 2.74%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-3.42%
Below half LSCC's 2.80%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.60%
50-75% of LSCC's -5.20%. Bruce Berkowitz notes moderate intangible additions. Check if growth is organically driven.
-1.36%
Similar yoy changes to LSCC's -1.29%. Walter Schloss sees parallel intangible strategies or acquisitions.
-0.49%
Both LSCC and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-4.17%
Less than half of LSCC's -51.93%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
34.74%
Less than half of LSCC's -3.01%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.18%
Below half of LSCC's -10.37%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.54%
Similar yoy to LSCC's -1.55%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions. Evaluate the quality of these assets.
-0.68%
Less than half of LSCC's -11.62%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-33.33%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
100.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
100.00%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's 19.17%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
26.70%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-9.90%
Above 1.5x LSCC's -1.77%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-0.43%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.34%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.39%
Less than half of LSCC's -71.15%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-1.97%
Less than half of LSCC's -71.15%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.79%
Less than half of LSCC's -18.52%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.27%
0.5-0.75x LSCC's 1.92%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
9.23%
Less than half of LSCC's -23.95%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.06%
0.5-0.75x LSCC's 1.99%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
-1.54%
Similar yoy to LSCC's -1.55%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total capital.
-15.19%
Below half LSCC's 1.79%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-9.11%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-7.11%
Less than half of LSCC's 2.69%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.