PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-8.19%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-8.19% vs LSCC's -0.89%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
24.57%
Short-term investments yoy growth ≥ 1.5x LSCC's 3.80%. David Dodd would see a more robust near-cash position, but confirm efficient allocation.
11.14%
Below half of LSCC's -0.89%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-15.64%
Receivables growth less than half of LSCC's 25.34%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
1.88%
Inventory growth below half of LSCC's -0.23%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-100.00%
Above 1.5x LSCC's -2.12%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
0.15%
Below half of LSCC's 2.53%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-3.07%
Below half LSCC's -30.63%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.34%
50-75% of LSCC's -7.17%. Bruce Berkowitz notes moderate intangible additions. Check if growth is organically driven.
-1.40%
Similar yoy changes to LSCC's -1.34%. Walter Schloss sees parallel intangible strategies or acquisitions.
2.28%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating better performance.
-2.82%
Less than half of LSCC's 127.84%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-2.62%
Less than half of LSCC's 3.15%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.87%
1.25-1.5x LSCC's -1.26%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions surpass competitor's pace but remain justified.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.99%
Below half of LSCC's 1.67%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
11.20%
Less than half of LSCC's -12.88%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-0.10%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-33.02%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
227.36%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's 32.34%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
6.50%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.72%
Above 1.5x LSCC's 0.34%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-0.05%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.33%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-45.23%
Less than half of LSCC's 22.81%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-2.42%
Less than half of LSCC's 22.81%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.31%
Less than half of LSCC's 2.72%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.59%
Below half LSCC's 7.38%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-13.68%
Less than half of LSCC's -110.50%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.77%
Below half LSCC's 1.51%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-0.99%
Below half LSCC's 1.67%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
22.25%
≥ 1.5x LSCC's 3.80%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
-0.06%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.11%
Above 1.5x LSCC's 0.89%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.