205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-23.19%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-23.19% vs LSCC's -7.46%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
20.62%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating better performance.
0.07%
Below half of LSCC's -7.46%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
4.21%
Receivables growth 50-75% of LSCC's 6.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would note relatively tighter receivables. Check if sales remain robust.
13.41%
Inventory growth below half of LSCC's -4.77%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-11.50%
Other current assets growth < half of LSCC's 13.59%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
3.27%
Below half of LSCC's -1.22%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
11.22%
Below half LSCC's -3.20%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.14%
Less than half of LSCC's -4.76%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
0.07%
Less than half of LSCC's -0.34%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
531.03%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating better performance.
10.49%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
10.56%
Less than half of LSCC's -8.11%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
8.65%
Below half of LSCC's -1.02%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.88%
Below half of LSCC's -1.11%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-3.05%
Less than half of LSCC's 1.03%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-40.20%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-67.47%
50-75% of LSCC's -100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a relatively controlled tax liability increase.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.64%
Less than half of LSCC's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-6.65%
1.1-1.25x LSCC's -5.34%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is taking on more near-term obligations than competitor.
13.44%
Less than half of LSCC's -62.11%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.48%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-5.46%
Less than half of LSCC's 36.08%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
10.97%
Less than half of LSCC's -40.61%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.31%
Less than half of LSCC's -27.05%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.16%
Below half LSCC's 91.79%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
2.38%
Less than half of LSCC's -20.54%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.57%
Below half LSCC's 11.61%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
5.88%
Below half LSCC's -1.11%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
20.62%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to LSCC's zero value, indicating better performance.
10.79%
Less than half of LSCC's -52.77%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
37.72%
Less than half of LSCC's -1427.77%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.