PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-3.16%
Cash & equivalents declining -3.16% while MCHP's grows 17.07%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
9.58%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
3.64%
Below half of MCHP's 17.07%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
7.11%
Similar receivables growth to MCHP's 7.88%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
4.86%
Inventory growth 50-75% of MCHP's 6.60%. Bruce Berkowitz sees relatively tighter stock. Confirm sales aren't sacrificed.
2.70%
Other current assets growth < half of MCHP's 60.00%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
5.10%
Below half of MCHP's 12.03%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
4.02%
Below half MCHP's 37.22%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.42%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-17.05%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.93%
Below half of MCHP's 36.81%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.78%
Below half of MCHP's 17.93%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
5.07%
Less than half of MCHP's 42.50%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-7.50%
Less than half of MCHP's 10.26%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.63%
Less than half of MCHP's 34.02%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.73%
Less than half of MCHP's 42.86%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.80%
Less than half of MCHP's -13.64%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
0.77%
Less than half of MCHP's 21.05%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.27%
Less than half of MCHP's 31.54%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.31%
Below half MCHP's 168.18%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.77%
0.75-0.9x MCHP's 9.23%. Bill Ackman wonders if competitor is growing equity faster.
3.78%
Below half MCHP's 17.93%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
9.58%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.41%
Less than half of MCHP's 25.68%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
1.04%
Less than half of MCHP's -12.21%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.