PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
6.59%
Cash & equivalents growing 6.59% while MCHP's declined -41.20%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
0.38%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
3.95%
Below half of MCHP's -41.20%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-1.10%
Receivables growth less than half of MCHP's 96.48%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
1.38%
Inventory growth below half of MCHP's 13.30%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
0.90%
Other current assets growth < half of MCHP's -10.81%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
1.21%
Below half of MCHP's 8.14%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
4.94%
Below half MCHP's 21.25%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.33%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.94%
Less than half of MCHP's 100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
3.41%
Below half of MCHP's 21.43%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.13%
Below half of MCHP's 12.57%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
198.89%
Less than half of MCHP's -48.25%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-71.43%
Less than half of MCHP's 3.77%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.69%
Higher Total Current Liabilities Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.62%
Less than half of MCHP's 32.11%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.07%
Less than half of MCHP's 145.45%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-2.51%
Less than half of MCHP's 67.50%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.75%
Less than half of MCHP's 14.62%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.38%
Below half MCHP's 58.97%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
91.67%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.15%
0.5-0.75x MCHP's 11.13%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
2.13%
Below half MCHP's 12.57%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
0.38%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
-4.09%
Less than half of MCHP's 22.84%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-57.75%
Less than half of MCHP's 82.21%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.