205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
7.57%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth 0.5-0.75x MCHP's 14.79%. Martin Whitman would worry if slower accumulation signals weaker operations or bigger outflows.
-43.58%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-3.12%
Below half of MCHP's 14.79%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-5.71%
Receivables growth less than half of MCHP's -25.98%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
6.77%
Similar inventory growth to MCHP's 7.77%. Walter Schloss notes comparable inventory strategies or sector norms.
116.11%
Other current assets growth < half of MCHP's 355.93%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
4.45%
Below half of MCHP's 12.05%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
11.63%
1.25-1.5x MCHP's 10.07%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a significant push to expand capacity faster than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.23%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
17.57%
50-75% of MCHP's 33.33%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower 'other assets' expansions.
10.00%
Similar yoy growth to MCHP's 10.14%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions in non-current assets.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.61%
0.5-0.75x MCHP's 11.19%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
159.01%
Above 1.5x MCHP's 0.89%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
-57.81%
Less than half of MCHP's 8.93%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.16%
1.25-1.5x MCHP's 7.28%. Martin Whitman is wary of bigger short-term burdens.
-2.19%
Less than half of MCHP's -5.56%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.54%
Less than half of MCHP's 2200.00%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
1.63%
Less than half of MCHP's 12.04%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.78%
Similar yoy to MCHP's 8.41%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total liabilities.
0.53%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
9.88%
Below half MCHP's 24.49%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
98.11%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.39%
0.5-0.75x MCHP's 12.75%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
6.61%
0.5-0.75x MCHP's 11.19%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
-43.58%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-6.21%
Above 1.5x MCHP's -1.83%. Michael Burry sees a major jump. Investigate leverage rationale.
-39.53%
50-75% of MCHP's -69.70%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.