PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-30.88%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-30.88% vs MCHP's -2.31%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-79.49%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-32.74%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x MCHP's -2.31%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
10.02%
Receivables growth 50-75% of MCHP's 14.72%. Bruce Berkowitz would note relatively tighter receivables. Check if sales remain robust.
-13.16%
Inventory growth below half of MCHP's 9.68%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-3.66%
Other current assets growth < half of MCHP's -23.76%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-6.53%
Below half of MCHP's 2.58%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
11.48%
0.5-0.75x MCHP's 20.42%. Martin Whitman might see a risk of falling behind in asset investment or shifting strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.17%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
47.07%
Less than half of MCHP's 141.18%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
13.72%
0.5-0.75x MCHP's 21.82%. Martin Whitman wonders if there's insufficient reinvestment vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.42%
Below half of MCHP's 12.08%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-13.21%
Less than half of MCHP's 39.39%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
149.40%
Less than half of MCHP's -3.39%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.28%
Less than half of MCHP's 20.33%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
37.12%
Less than half of MCHP's 82.12%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.57%
Less than half of MCHP's -65.00%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
19.45%
Less than half of MCHP's 55.09%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.67%
Less than half of MCHP's 27.30%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.89%
Below half MCHP's 7.32%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.83%
Below half MCHP's 3.51%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
3.42%
Below half MCHP's 12.08%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-79.49%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
44.26%
Similar yoy changes to MCHP's 58.10%. Walter Schloss notes parallel total debt strategies.
268.29%
Above 1.5x MCHP's 138.71%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.