PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
2.59%
Cash & equivalents growing 2.59% while MCHP's declined -27.42%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
350.00%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
7.57%
Below half of MCHP's -27.42%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-5.56%
Receivables growth 1.25-1.5x MCHP's -3.92%. Martin Whitman would worry that the company may be booking revenue too aggressively.
-5.69%
Inventory growth below half of MCHP's 6.60%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
3.35%
Other current assets growth < half of MCHP's -9.45%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-0.70%
Below half of MCHP's -4.50%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.68%
Below half MCHP's 7.37%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.08%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.45%
Less than half of MCHP's 16.02%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.35%
Below half of MCHP's 7.56%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.04%
Below half of MCHP's 2.29%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-66.39%
Above 1.5x MCHP's -3.81%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
17.20%
Less than half of MCHP's 62.05%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
1.25-1.5x MCHP's -73.83%. Martin Whitman sees a potentially higher near-term liability load.
-7.08%
Less than half of MCHP's 1.58%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-3.18%
Less than half of MCHP's -7.44%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.37%
Less than half of MCHP's 9.86%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-2.09%
Less than half of MCHP's 8.03%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.45%
Less than half of MCHP's 3.35%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.53%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.45%
0.5-0.75x MCHP's 6.77%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
-9.09%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.34%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's 1.62%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-1.04%
Below half MCHP's 2.29%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
350.00%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.39%
Less than half of MCHP's 189.97%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.