PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-33.57%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-33.57% vs MCHP's -13.52%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
747.62%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
13.21%
Below half of MCHP's -13.52%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
4.12%
Receivables growth 50-75% of MCHP's 6.95%. Bruce Berkowitz would note relatively tighter receivables. Check if sales remain robust.
11.16%
Inventory growth below half of MCHP's -1.21%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-0.42%
Other current assets growth < half of MCHP's 1.96%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
6.33%
Below half of MCHP's -0.09%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
0.68%
Below half MCHP's 4.65%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.30%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-28.39%
Less than half of MCHP's 3.49%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-3.22%
Below half of MCHP's 4.62%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.34%
Below half of MCHP's 2.70%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
14.72%
Less than half of MCHP's -6.70%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-85.87%
Less than half of MCHP's 64.67%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.27%
Less than half of MCHP's 4.09%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
1.46%
Less than half of MCHP's 21.72%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.62%
Less than half of MCHP's 12.74%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
2.32%
Less than half of MCHP's 7.88%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.09%
Less than half of MCHP's 5.17%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.52%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.42%
0.5-0.75x MCHP's 12.46%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
-116.67%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.41%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's 1.11%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
1.34%
Below half MCHP's 2.70%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
747.62%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
-14.52%
Less than half of MCHP's 15.94%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
3.91%
Less than half of MCHP's 44.96%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.