205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
53.37%
Cash & equivalents growing 53.37% while MCHP's declined -10.94%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-26.37%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
1.61%
Below half of MCHP's -10.94%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-5.10%
Receivables growth less than half of MCHP's 4.99%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-9.02%
Inventory growth above 1.5x MCHP's -0.91%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
-7.81%
Other current assets growth < half of MCHP's 9.22%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-2.75%
≥ 1.5x MCHP's -0.79%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-0.37%
Below half MCHP's 13.95%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.19%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
12.13%
Less than half of MCHP's -1.58%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.61%
Below half of MCHP's 13.67%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.16%
Below half of MCHP's 7.04%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-15.22%
Less than half of MCHP's 8.21%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
19.40%
Less than half of MCHP's -2.33%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.76%
Less than half of MCHP's 8.83%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-1.28%
Less than half of MCHP's 20.92%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.39%
Less than half of MCHP's 3.53%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-2.78%
Less than half of MCHP's -9.62%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.32%
Less than half of MCHP's 7.23%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.26%
Less than half of MCHP's 1.89%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
0.20%
Below half MCHP's 11.44%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
25.00%
Less than half of MCHP's -11.69%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.30%
Below half MCHP's 6.96%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.16%
Below half MCHP's 7.04%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-26.37%
Both MCHP and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-0.23%
Less than half of MCHP's -11.84%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-92.34%
Less than half of MCHP's 10.77%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.