205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-29.47%
Cash & equivalents declining -29.47% while MCHP's grows 55.87%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
30.67%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
11.15%
Below half of MCHP's 55.87%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
12.58%
Receivables growth above 1.5x MCHP's 0.96%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
10.11%
Inventory growth below half of MCHP's -6.61%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
2.34%
Other current assets growth < half of MCHP's -2.09%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
10.41%
1.25-1.5x MCHP's 8.80%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if strong current asset growth is used effectively.
8.18%
0.5-0.75x MCHP's 14.33%. Martin Whitman might see a risk of falling behind in asset investment or shifting strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
118.24%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
118.24%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.16%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-44.42%
Less than half of MCHP's 11.88%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-17.48%
Below half of MCHP's 14.28%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.23%
Below half of MCHP's 12.15%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
9.38%
Less than half of MCHP's -5.69%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-47.01%
Less than half of MCHP's 13788.89%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.54%
Less than half of MCHP's 20.27%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
25.57%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.35%
Less than half of MCHP's 3.25%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-5.96%
Less than half of MCHP's 0.34%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-19.97%
Less than half of MCHP's 3.04%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.37%
Less than half of MCHP's 18.84%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
5.48%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
11.70%
1.25-1.5x MCHP's 9.17%. Bruce Berkowitz notes stronger reinvestment strategy.
-67.54%
Above 1.5x MCHP's -15.20%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.81%
Below half MCHP's 9.80%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-6.23%
Below half MCHP's 12.15%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
30.67%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to MCHP's zero value, indicating better performance.
4.89%
Less than half of MCHP's 13788.89%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
2180.95%
Less than half of MCHP's -22.03%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.